Index: lib/csp.js |
diff --git a/lib/csp.js b/lib/csp.js |
index 6e7656d1b552a99a74279fefe5fe037a13a89840..8b4111cdee637f3092576c7bd45c6dd827c2c4b0 100644 |
--- a/lib/csp.js |
+++ b/lib/csp.js |
@@ -17,53 +17,63 @@ |
"use strict"; |
-// The webRequest API doesn't support WebSocket connection blocking in Microsoft |
-// Edge and versions of Chrome before 58. Therefore for those we inject CSP |
-// headers below as a workaround. See https://crbug.com/129353 and |
-// https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/platform/issues/10297376/ |
-if (!browser.webRequest.ResourceType || |
- !("WEBSOCKET" in browser.webRequest.ResourceType)) |
+const {defaultMatcher} = require("matcher"); |
+const {RegExpFilter, WhitelistFilter} = require("filterClasses"); |
+const {extractHostFromFrame, getDecodedHostname, |
+ isThirdParty, stringifyURL} = require("url"); |
+const {checkWhitelisted} = require("whitelisting"); |
+const {FilterNotifier} = require("filterNotifier"); |
+const devtools = require("devtools"); |
+ |
+const {typeMap} = RegExpFilter; |
+ |
+browser.webRequest.onHeadersReceived.addListener(details => |
{ |
- const {defaultMatcher} = require("matcher"); |
- const {BlockingFilter, RegExpFilter} = require("filterClasses"); |
- const {getDecodedHostname} = require("url"); |
- const {checkWhitelisted} = require("whitelisting"); |
+ let url = new URL(details.url); |
+ let urlString = stringifyURL(url); |
+ let parentFrame = details.parentFrameId != -1 && |
Sebastian Noack
2018/03/19 22:25:12
Nit: ext.getFrame(details.tabId, -1) just returns
kzar
2018/03/20 09:02:31
Done.
|
+ ext.getFrame(details.tabId, details.parentFrameId); |
+ let hostname = extractHostFromFrame(parentFrame) || getDecodedHostname(url); |
+ let thirdParty = isThirdParty(url, hostname); |
- browser.webRequest.onHeadersReceived.addListener(details => |
+ let cspMatch = defaultMatcher.matchesAny(urlString, typeMap.CSP, hostname, |
+ thirdParty, null, false); |
+ if (cspMatch) |
{ |
- let hostname = getDecodedHostname(new URL(details.url)); |
- let match = defaultMatcher.matchesAny("", RegExpFilter.typeMap.WEBSOCKET, |
- hostname, false, null, true); |
- if (match instanceof BlockingFilter && |
- !checkWhitelisted(new ext.Page({id: details.tabId}), |
- ext.getFrame(details.tabId, details.frameId))) |
+ let page = new ext.Page({id: details.tabId, url: details.url}); |
+ let frame = ext.getFrame(details.tabId, details.frameId); |
+ |
+ if (checkWhitelisted(page, frame)) |
+ return; |
+ |
+ // To avoid an extra matchesAny for the common case we assumed no |
+ // $genericblock filters applied when searching for a matching $csp filter. |
+ // We must now pay the price by first checking for a $genericblock filter |
+ // and if necessary that our $csp filter is specific. |
+ let specificOnly = checkWhitelisted(page, frame, typeMap.GENERICBLOCK); |
Sebastian Noack
2018/03/19 22:25:12
checkWhitelisted() returns a filter object (or nul
kzar
2018/03/20 09:02:31
Done.
|
+ if (specificOnly) |
{ |
- details.responseHeaders.push({ |
- name: "Content-Security-Policy", |
- // We're blocking WebSockets here by adding a connect-src restriction |
- // since the Chrome extension API does not allow us to intercept them. |
- // https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=129353 |
- // |
- // We also need the frame-src and object-src restrictions since CSPs |
- // are not inherited from the parent for documents with data: and blob: |
- // URLs, see https://crbug.com/513860. |
- // |
- // We must use the deprecated child-src directive instead of worker-src |
- // since that's not supported yet (as of Chrome 56.) |
- // |
- // "http:" also includes "https:" implictly. |
- // https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/6653486812889088 |
- value: "connect-src http:; child-src http:; " + |
- "frame-src http:; object-src http:" |
- }); |
- return {responseHeaders: details.responseHeaders}; |
+ cspMatch = defaultMatcher.matchesAny(urlString, typeMap.CSP, hostname, |
+ thirdParty, null, specificOnly); |
+ if (!cspMatch) |
+ return; |
} |
- }, { |
- urls: ["http://*/*", "https://*/*"], |
- // We must also intercept script requests since otherwise Web Workers can |
- // be abused to execute scripts for which our Content Security Policy |
- // won't be injected. |
- // https://github.com/gorhill/uBO-Extra/issues/19 |
- types: ["main_frame", "sub_frame", "script"] |
- }, ["blocking", "responseHeaders"]); |
-} |
+ |
+ devtools.logRequest(page, urlString, "CSP", hostname, thirdParty, null, |
+ specificOnly, cspMatch); |
+ |
+ if (cspMatch instanceof WhitelistFilter) |
+ return; |
+ |
+ FilterNotifier.emit("filter.hitCount", cspMatch, 0, 0, page); |
Sebastian Noack
2018/03/19 22:25:12
This seems inconsistent. For requests, we emit fil
kzar
2018/03/20 09:02:31
Done.
|
+ details.responseHeaders.push({ |
+ name: "Content-Security-Policy", |
+ value: cspMatch.csp |
+ }); |
+ |
+ return {responseHeaders: details.responseHeaders}; |
+ } |
+}, { |
+ urls: ["http://*/*", "https://*/*"], |
+ types: ["main_frame", "sub_frame"] |
+}, ["blocking", "responseHeaders"]); |